January 29, 2007 Swing Kids
Here's another one of those films
that slipped by me when it came out. I am sad it surfaced recently!
i didn't like it one bit. Especiallyhenhad tolok tifromahumandevelopment
perspective!
The most obvious application of
developmental theory is the hurdle that I see evidenced- Erikson's idea
of identity establishment. Peter, Thomas, and to a lesser extent Arvid
experience various levels of Marcia's identity statuses. Thomas moves
between identity diffusion and foreclosure; he has no evidence of charting
his future and believes he can have the best of both worlds- Hitler
Youth (HJ) by day and Swing Kid by night. He ends up exhibiting his
lack of developed identity and positive parental influences by betraying
his friends and family for the attention he is given by the propagandists.
Arvid has a more settled identity and thinks deeply about the ramifications
of his choices, perhaps as a result of identification based rooted in
his own suffering caused by his deformity. Arvid does not look the other
way. He continues to pursue his music even when his hand is crushed
by reprogrammed former hep-cat Emile who has "wised up" (makes
one wonder if this is an allusion to Rousseau's perfectly educated student,
but again, I am probably reading too much into this.) Arvid eventually
commits suicide when faced with the obliteration of the things he holds
as most precious. In the absence of hope, he self-consciously determines
to declare his autonomy in a drastic way.
Peter is committed to an identity as a Swing Kid and future engineer,
but experiences a crisis or moratorium state when faced with the spiraling
moral dilemma he faces as the Nazi regime moves forward. He is plagued
by conflicted questions about the character of his father, whose actions
he cannot rationalize in his mind. A turning point in his development
is evidenced when he is asked to spy on his employer and determines
not to reveal what he has found out. In the end he comes to see his
father's greatness. Another turning point is his move from a Kohlbergian
level 2 conventional morality ("If they were expelled they must
have done something wrong") to a more principled morality by the
time of his encounter with the wife of one of his father's students.
Peter makes a personal commitment after soul-searching in the light
of his personal circumstances. The viewer is left wondering at the wisdom
of his choice to go down in flames, so to speak, in a final act of defiance
rather than learning from his father's example by which he served others
and became a martyr.Peter also has a role model in his employer Herr
Schumler-(hmm, an allusion to Oskar Schindler?) who risks everything
to help the helpless. Or was it for a price? To this viewer, Peter abdicated
his responsibilities as the man of his household in a foolish display
of protest. Mindless quote" It doesn't matter- it's OK Willie!"
The adolescent need for belonging is played out whether it is in the
Swing Kids cohort or in the HJ. The backdrop of the Holocaust is very
secondary. Kenneth Branaugh does bring an air of evil to his role, addressing
Hitler's appeal to a lost generation by "serving the Fatherland."
It is easy to read too much into this rather naïve story. For the
most part, a bloodless Holocaust, gangs of ruffians, and escapism by
night into the relics of other cultures as depicted do not paint a clear
picture of the incredible evil that German society was experiencing-which
of itself was a metacrisis of identity. The movie implies that the summum
bonum was the freedom to dance and only addresses the evils perpetrated
against Jews in an offhanded way through Arvid's suffering and Peter's
stint as the messenger of Death. The final credits tell a lot. The Swing
Kids were not dedicated to the overthrow of Nazism, they were dedicated
to the pleasure principle and were opposed to the Nazis because they
didn't swing. You get the feeling that if Hitler had appropriated Swing
as part of his propaganda machine, all things being equal, the Jews
could fend for themselves. Swing Heil? So what?