A definition of the Trinity is not easy to construct. Some are
done by stating several propositions. Others err on the side either of oneness
or threeness. One of the best is Warfield’s: “There is one only and
true God, but in the unity of the Godhead there are three coeternal and coequal
Persons, the same in substance but distinct in subsistence.”
Hypostases is the plural of hypostasis which means “the substance, the
underlying reality, or essence.”
It is evident that the word “person” is not ideal for
the purpose. Orthodox writers have struggled over this term. Some have opted
for the term subsistence
(the mode or quality of existence), hence, “God has three
substances.” Most have continued to use persons because we have not been able to find a
better term. “The word substance speaks of God’s essential nature or being and subsistence describes His mode or quality of
existence.”
In its theological usage, essence refers to “the intrinsic
or indispensable, permanent, and inseparable qualities that characterize or
identify the being of God.” The words triunity and trinity are used to
refer to the fact that the Bible speaks of one God, but attributes the
characteristics of God to three Persons: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
God is one Divine Being who acts and thinks as one within a
three-fold personality. This is incomprehensible to our finite and limited
minds, but it is the teaching of the Scripture. “In the Being of God
there are not three individuals, but only three personal self distinctions within
the one Divine Essence.
Tri-theism. This is the teaching that there are three Gods who are sometimes
related, but only in a loose association. Such an approach, abandons the
biblical oneness of God and the unity within the Trinity.
Sabellianism
or Modalism. Sabellius (A.D. 200), the originator of this viewpoint, spoke of
Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, but he understood all three as no more than three
manifestations of one God. This teaching came to be known as modalism because
it views one God who variously manifests Himself in three modes of existence:
Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
Arianism.
This doctrine had it roots in Tertullian, who made the Son subordinate to the
Father. Origen took this further by teaching that the Son was subordinate to
the Father “in respect to essence.” The result was ultimately
Arianism which denied the deity of Christ. Arius taught that only God was the
uncreated One; because Christ was begotten of the Father it meant Christ was
created by the Father. Arius believed there was a time when Christ did not
exist. Arius and his teaching was condemned at the Council of Nicea in A.D. 325
Scriptures Demonstrating
God, Who is One, is Also Three
Old Testament Scriptures
While there is no explicit statement in the Old Testament
affirming the Triunity, we can confidently say that the Old Testament not only
allows for the Triunity, but also implies that God is a triune Being in a
number of ways:
(1) The name Elohim, translated God, is the plural form of El. While this is what is called a plural of plenitude
pointing to the power and majesty of God, it certainly allows for the New
Testament revelation of the Triunity of God.
(2) There are many instances where God uses the plural pronoun to
describe Himself (see Gen. 1:26; 3:22; 11:7; Isa. 6:8).
(3) In the creation account, both God the Father and God the Holy
Spirit are seen in the work of creation. It is stated that God created heaven
and earth (Gen. 1:1), but that it was the Holy Spirit who moved over the earth
to infuse it with life in the sense of protecting and participating in the work
of creation (Gen. 1:2).
(4) Writing about the Messiah, Isaiah reveals Him to be equal with
God, calling Him the “Mighty God” and “Eternal Father”
(Isa. 9:6).
(5) Several passages reveal a distinction of Persons within the
Godhead.
* In
Psalm 110:1, David demonstrates there is a distinction of Persons between
“LORD,” the one speaking, and the one addressed called by David,
“my Lord.” David was indicating the Messiah was no ordinary king,
but his own Lord, Adoni
(my Lord), one who was God Himself. So God the first Person addresses God the
second Person. This is precisely Peter’s when He quotes this Psalm
to show the resurrection of the Messiah was anticipated in the Old Testament.
* The
Redeemer (who must be divine, Isa. 7:14; 9:6) is distinguished from the Lord
(Isa. 59:20).
* The
Lord is distinguished from the Lord in Hosea 1:6-7. The one speaking here is Yahweh, the Lord, yet, note the statement in
verse 7, “I will have compassion … and deliver them by the Lord
their God.”
* The
Spirit is distinguished from the Lord in a number of passages (Isa. 48:16;
59:21; 63:9-10).
(6) In the Messianic prophecy of Isaiah 7:14, God made it clear
that the One who would be born of the virgin would also be Immanuel, God with
us.
(7) Two other passages which imply the Trinity are Isaiah 48:16
and 61:1. In Isaiah 48:16 all three Persons are mentioned and yet seen as
distinct from each other. See also Gen. 22:15-16.
New Testament Scriptures
The case for the Triunity of God is even stronger in the New
Testament. Here it can be unequivocally demonstrated the Father is God, the Son
is God, and the Holy Spirit is God. Furthermore, the New Testament teaches us
that these three names are not synonymous, but speak of three distinct and
equal Persons.
(1) The Father is called God (John 6:27; 20:17; 1 Cor. 8:6; Gal. 1:1; Eph. 4:6; Phil.
2:11; 1 Pet. 1:2).
(2) Jesus Christ, the Son is declared to be God. His deity is proven by the divine names given to Him, by
His works that only God could do (upholding all things, Col. 1:17; creation,
Col. 1:16, John 1:3; and future judgment, John 5:27), by His divine attributes
(eternality, John 17:5; omnipresence, Matt. 28:20; omnipotence, Heb. 1:3;
omniscience, Matt. 9:4), and by explicit statements declaring His deity (John
1:1; 20:28; Titus 2:13; Heb. 1:8).
(3) The Holy Spirit is recognized as God. By comparing Peter’s comments in
Acts 5:3 and 4, we see that in lying to the Holy Spirit (vs. 3), Ananias was
lying to God (vs. 4). He has the attributes which only God can possess like
omniscience (1 Cor. 2:10) and omnipresence (1 Cor. 6:19), and He regenerates
people to new life (John 3:5-6, 8; Tit. 3:5), which must of necessity be a work
of God for only God has the power of life. Finally, His deity is evident by the
divine names used for the Spirit as “the Spirit of our God,” (1
Cor. 6:11), which should be understood as “the Spirit, who is our
God.”
Ryrie writes: “Matthew 28:19 best states both the oneness
and threeness by associating equally the three Persons and uniting them in one
singular name. Other
passages like Matthew 3:16-17 and 2 Corinthians 13:14 associate equally the
three Persons but do not contain the strong emphasis on unity as does Matthew
28:19.”
The New Bible Dictionary, adds to this the following evidence:
The evidence of the NT writings, apart from the Gospels, is
sufficient to show that Christ had instructed his disciples on this doctrine to
a greater extent than is recorded by any of the four Evangelists. They
whole-heartedly proclaim the doctrine of the Trinity as the threefold source of
redemption. The outpouring of the Spirit at Pentecost brought the personality
of the Spirit into greater prominence and at the same time shed light anew from
the Spirit upon the Son. Peter, in explaining the phenomenon of Pentecost,
represents it as the activity of the Trinity: ‘This Jesus … being
… exalted at the right hand of God, and having received from the Father
the promise of the Holy Spirit, he has poured out this which you see and
hear’ (Acts 2:32-33). So the church of Pentecost was founded on the
doctrine of the Trinity.
In 1 Cor. there is mention of the gifts of the Spirit, the
varieties of service for the same Lord and the inspiration of the same God for
the work (1 Cor. 12:4-6).
Peter traces salvation to the same triunal source: ‘destined
by God the Father and sanctified by the Spirit for obedience to Jesus
Christ’ (1 Pet. 1:2). The apostolic benediction: ‘The grace of the
Lord Jesus Christ and the love of God and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit be
with you all’ (2 Cor. 13:14), not only sums up the apostolic teaching,
but interprets the deeper meaning of the Trinity in Christian experience, the
saving grace of the Son giving access to the love of the Father and to the
communion of the Spirit.
What is amazing, however, is that this confession of God as One in
Three took place without struggle and without controversy by a people
indoctrinated for centuries in the faith of the one God, and that in entering
the Christian church they were not conscious of any break with their ancient
faith.19
From the above evidence, it should be clear that the Scripture
teaches God is one and three.
The Meaning of “Only-begotten”
The Meaning of “First-born”
Another term that has been misinterpreted by some as it is used of
Christ is the term “firstborn.” It is used of Christ in Romans
8:29; Colossians 1:15, 18; Hebrews 1:6; and Revelation 1:5. Again, because of
the thought of birth that this word denotes in our minds, this passage has been
used to teach that Christ was not the eternal second Person of the Trinity
because He had a beginning as the firstborn of God. “Firstborn” is
the Greek prototokos
(from protos, first,
and tikto, to beget),
but this word may mean (a) first in time, or (b) first in priority. The point
and focus of the word must be taken from the context in which it is used.
What does Oneness Pentecostal teach?
Oneness Pentecostal people are many and
varied. The two main groups that hold to Oneness theology are the United
Pentecostal Church International (the largest) and the United Apostolic
church. There are others like the Assemblies of the Lord Jesus Christ and
the Bible Way Churches of Our Lord Jesus Christ as well as a host of independent
Oneness churches scattered throughout the United States.
The following points of doctrine are
generally held to by the Oneness Pentecostal groups.
Within Orthodoxy
1. There
is only one God in all existence
2. The
Bible is God's inerrant word
3. Jesus
was born of a virgin
4. Jesus
had two natures.
5. Justification
by faith
6. Baptism
must be by immersion.1
7. The
elements of communion are bread and wine and are only for believers.
8. Foot-washing
(John 13:4-5), is a divine institution to be practiced by church members.2
9. Abstain
from joining secret societies (James 5:12; 2 Cor. 6:14-18).
10. There
will be a future rapture of the Church where the Christians will be transformed
(1 Thess. 4:13-17; 1 Cor. 15:51-54; Phil. 3:20-21).
Outside of Orthodoxy
1. Denies
the doctrine of the Trinity.
2. Denies
justification by faith alone by stating that baptism is also required.
3. Jesus
is God the Father.
4. Jesus
is the Holy Spirit.
5. The
name of God is "Jesus."
6. Baptism
is necessary for salvation.
7. Denies
pre-existence of the Word as the Son. Teaches that the He existed as the
Father.
8. Being
born again means repentance, baptism, and speaking in tongues.
9. Baptism
must be administered by an ordained Oneness minister to be valid.
10. Baptism
must be administered with the phrase, "In the name of Jesus" instead
of the phrase, "In the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy
Spirit" (Matt.
28:19).
11. Speaking
in tongues is a necessary requirement to demonstrate that a person has been
baptized in the Holy Spirit, and is, therefore, saved. It is claimed to
be the initial
sign of the infilling of the Holy Ghost.
12. Restitution
of all things, though the devil and the angels will not be restored.
13. Women
may be pastors.3
14. Only
Oneness people will go to heaven.
At
that time the church did not have a precise teaching written down on the
Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. The Trinity doctrine is criticized by Oneness and
others, because they claim it was developed and was not fully accepted until
the fourth century at the council of Nicaea. All one has to do is look at
history to find the enlightening truth. The doctrine was not developed, but the
explanation of it. Almost all the theological doctrines have had some
development through the years to explain them in a better fashion. As assaults
were launched and men rose to the challenges to defend and affirm what the
Scriptures say, explanations needed to be clarified. Other such doctrines that
were significant in the development of the Church’s history were the
nature of man, doctrines of salvation, church government, the attributes of
God, the inspiration of Scripture, what was part of the canon, and the
afterlife. Many of these issues continue on today and are still currently being
formulated in written fashion to give us a better understanding.
Analogies Good and Bad
While it is true that Father, Son, and Spirit are all God, we
cannot correctly say that the Father is the Son, or that Spirit and Son are
interchangeable. Analogies therefore need to be carefully selected, lest we
inadvertently support false doctrine through our attempts to refute it.
The analogy I most often use to explain the trinity is the analogy
of the amorphous forms of H20. Ice = water, liquid water = water, and steam =
water (in essence), but ice 1 steam, etc. Though I like the water analogy, its
shortcoming is that it implies the false doctrine of modalism - that God
appears in one form now, another at another time. I have heard worse analogies:
time (past, present and future), even an egg (shell, white and yolk)!
Opponents of trinity ask, how can 1 + 1 + 1 = 1? But the
mathematics is all wrong. Really it's a case of 13 : 1 x 1 x 1 = 1. As someone
put it more academically, "A better illustration based in human nature
would be, as suggested earlier, the relation between our mind, its ideas, and
the expression of these ideas in words. There is obviously a unity among all
three of these without there being an identity. In this sense, they illustrate
the Trinity."
No single analogy captures the divine mystery, though the various
pictures will be more convincing to different people.
Identical twins: They share the same genetic material, so that their bodies even
accept one another's organs. Yet they are clearly separate persons who marry
different spouses, have different careers, etc. (This emphasizes diversity more
than unity.)
Water's "triple point": At a certain pressure and temperature,
different H20 molecules exist as ice, water, and steam. (They may emphasize
diversity more than unity.)
Marriage:
Two distinct persons who maintain their personhood but whose lives are united
in many ways: physically, love relationship, etc.
No analogy, no example to help explain the nature of the trinity is
going to be without its flaws. Every analogy breaks down, every example remains
less than completely satisfying. It must be understood that the doctrine of The
Trinity is designed to remove the paradox that, though the Father is God, the
Son is God, and the Holy Spirit is God, yet there is but one God.
Eusebius of Caesarea, the first church historian, suggested a
compromise creed which he used for the church in his city which said that Jesus
is "the Word of God, God of God, … the first-born of all creatures,
begotten of the Father before all time." Most of the bishops were
satisfied with this. Even the Arians agreed to adopt it. It was
Alexander’s party who strongly opposed it because it did not resolve the
issue. Prompted by Hosius, Constantine suggested the inclusion of homoousios to the statement, meaning "of the
same substance." To this the Arians strongly reacted, and those who
followed Origen’s teachings, it seemed too much like modalism, which
taught that Jesus’ deity was actually the Father Himself. They proposed
that homoiousios be used,
meaning "of similar substance." Through Alexander’s eloquence
his views prevailed. The Creed that was presented in its final form reads:
We believe in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of all things
visible and invisible. And in one Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, begotten
of the Father, the only begotten; that is, of the essence of the Father, God of
God, Light of Light, very God of very God, begotten, not made, being of one
substance [homoousios]
with the Father; by whom all things were made both in heaven and on earth; who
for us men, and for our salvation, came down and was incarnate and was made
man; he suffered, and the third day he rose again, ascended into heaven; from
thence he shall come to judge the quick and the dead. And in the Holy Ghost.
But those who say: "There was a time when he was not"; and "He
was not before he was made"; and "He was made out of nothing,"
or "He is of another substance" or "essence," or "The
Son of God is created," or "changeable," or
"alterable"-they are condemned by the holy catholic and apostolic
church.
"Of the essence of the Father" and "of one
substance with the Father" clearly refuted any idea that the Logos was
less than full deity. "Begotten, not made" clearly refuted the Arian
denial of the coeternal existence of the Logos with the Father. The final
paragraph, also known as the condemnatory clause, condemned the various ways in
which Arius’ teachings were spoken of.